Quantcast

DOJ: Killing American Citizens With Drones Is Constitutional Because Obama And Holder Said So…

 Reuters

Reuters

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration’s targeted drone strikes against American citizens were constitutional in part because the president said so, Department of Justice lawyers argued in a court filing this week.

“The Attorney General’s statement last month that the use of remotely piloted aircraft and the targeting of Anwar Al-Aulaqi were subject to ‘exceptionally rigorous interagency legal review’ and determined to be lawful — along with the President’s statement that those actions were legal — only support the conclusion that those actions were lawful, and certainly were not clearly established to be unconstitutional in 2011,” the government said in a Wednesday court filing signed by Paul E. Werner, a trial lawyer in the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

The government was responding to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Constitutional Rights on behalf of the estates of three American citizens killed in drone strikes. The lawsuit, Al-Aulaqi v. Panetta, alleges that the government’s killing of Al-Aulaqi and his 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman Al-Aulaqi, and Samir Khan were unconstitutional because they were not given due process.

Keep reading via The Huffington Post…

H/T Weasel Zippers

Limbaugh: 'We are in the midst of a coup'...

EXPOSED: 'Massive apparatus in US Gov't building enormous structure with only one goal'... ...'to destroy privacy and anonymity, not just in the US, but around the world'...