Quantcast
ATTORNEY on Obama's SSN: 'Fraud & Treason Committed by the acting Commissioner of SSA Carolyn Colvin, 2 attorneys from the DOJ...'

ATTORNEY on Obama's SSN: 'Fraud & Treason Committed by the acting Commissioner of SSA Carolyn Colvin, 2 attorneys from the DOJ...'

obama2009taxReturnSSN_b.gif

Department of Justice and SSA provided a total nonsense response to my motion for Summary Judgment.

They are not denying that Social Security number 042-68-4425 was assigned to Bounel. They de facto admit it.  

If this number was not assigned to Bounel and he was born 123 years ago, they had to simply provide his SS-5 application, it would have shown a different number and it would be the end of it.

If it will show that the number is indeed 042-68-4425, then Obama and all of his accomplices go to prison.  Instead, they are violating their own 120 year rule and refusing to produce Bounel’s SS-5 because they admit that someone else is using this number today.

Since Obama posted this number with his tax returns, we know that he is using it, so we know that he is using a stolen a number. Because Obama is using Bounel’s stolen number today, they refuse to release Bounel’s SS-5 application.

In my opinion this is pure and simple fraud and treason committed by the acting Commissioner of SSA Carolyn Colvin, her SSA attorney and US Attorneys. They are de facto admitting to being complicit in the cover up.

This whole situation would be akin to someone stealing your house, squatting in your house  by using a fabricated deed and paying off a corrupt city clerk to keep your original deed sealed .  You demand from the city hall a copy     of the original deed to the house to prove to the court that this is your house.  The city clerk responds by saying that he cannot release the original deed in your name because the thief is using your house now. This is a complete idiocy. Continue reading via Dr. Orly Taitz...

 

WHITE HOUSE: Obama Implementing Executive Actions Following Navy Yard Shooting...

When (and Why) Did U.S. Military Bases Become ‘Gun-Free Zones’?