Second Nuclear Missile Firing to Deter Obama’s Enemies: Foreign or Domestic?
(via The Last Great Stand) -- This past weekend, actions by the Obama administration left a lot of Americans wondering how safe we really are, be it from foreign invaders, or from our own military. The U.S. Navy has issued a statement confirming the launch of two nuclear-capable missiles from a submarine off the coast of California on Saturday night. A lack of information about the missile test on Saturday led to a flurry of calls to law enforcement and posts on social media speculating that the unusual sighting was a UFO. Seeing some of the still photos taken, along with some of the video, both confirm that the irregular look to the missiles might have given pause to almost any casual onlooker who probably had no clue the missile was ALLEGEDLY an unarmed Trident II (D5) missile fired from the USS Kentucky, a ballistic missile submarine. Check out some stills and video for yourself in the below. In the first video, Spiro does an excellent job documenting the events of an “alleged” test flight of a Trident II nuclear missile. The first video by Spiro is well put together, and it has some fantastic still frame shots taken from every angle imaginable. Spiro even goes onto the Wikipedia page and explains the functionality of the missile as various pictures are shown.At first glance, nothing appears out of place, but like most reports involving Obama, there is conflicting information.
The U.S. Navy said it launched a second — and final — missile in a planned exercise Monday afternoon from a submarine off the Southern California coast. The second test launch of the Trident II (D5) missile from a ballistic submarine in the Pacific Ocean took place Monday afternoon, the Navy said. The blast-off took place to far less fanfare than Saturday night’s launch, which provoked residents from San Francisco to Mexico to take to social media, posting photos of an eerie-looking bluish-green plume smeared above the Pacific. Speculations were wide-ranging, including rumors of an otherworldly alien UFO visit. In fact, the streak was generated from the Trident missile’s rocket motor.The Navy later confirmed a ballistic submarine launched an unarmed Trident II (D5) missile in a test flight, but would not define the window of time available for conducting additional launches, nor would it disclose where the exercise was actually taking place. So what's the problem?
The issues with the “official” story have several problems. To begin with, one might ask if it was really the most prudent path to take by launching two nuclear capable missiles right in the midst of an international conflict in the Middle East that pits the U.S., against the Russians, the Iranians, and the Chinese. It could easily be viewed as Obama trying to provoke any of the above mentioned. Unfortunately, that's not the only hang-up. On Steve Quayle’s website, a nationally known radio host (Survive2thrive and Coast to Coast), photographer and author of a number of important books, a guest wrote in and said the following:
REGARDING THE STORIES THAT THE BLUE TINTED LIGHT SEEN AT NIGHT OFF THE COAST OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA WAS DUE TO THE TEST FIRING OF A TRIDENT II D-5 ICBM, I AM HIGHLY SKEPTICAL OF THIS EXPLANATION. I WORKED AS AN ENGINEER ON THE D-5 PROGRAM FOR SEVERAL YEARS, AND THUS, AM QUALIFIED TO COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE:
1) TEST FIRINGS ARE GENERALLY DONE DURING THE DAY. AS YOU MIGHT EXPECT, A TEST SHOT IS QUITE EXPENSIVE, AND THUS, ONE TRIES TO ACCOMPLISH MULTIPLE TEST GOALS WITH EACH LAUNCH. ONE OF THE OBJECTIVES OF A TEST FIRING IS EITHER TO TEST ONE OR MORE MISSILES IN A NEW BLOCK OF HARDWARE TO QUALIFY THE ENTIRE BLOCK, OR TO TEST ONE OR MORE AGED MISSILES TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY ARE STILL SUITABLE FOR DEPLOYMENT. IN CASE OF A FAILURE, VIDEO FOOTAGE IS INVALUABLE IN DETERMINING THE CAUSE OF THE FAILURE SO THAT CORRECTIVE ACTION CAN BE TAKEN. FIRING AT NIGHT PREVENTS THIS VITAL VIDEO RECORDING. NO PROGRAM MANAGER WORTH HIS SALT WOULD OPT FOR A NIGHT LAUNCH.
2) I WAS INVOLVED IN EARLY STATIC TESTS (WITH THE ROCKET MOTOR STRAPPED DOWN HORIZONTALLY) TO PROVIDE TARGETS FOR THE “STAR WARS” LAUNCH DETECTION SATELLITES. THESE EARLY TESTS WERE CONDUCTED AT NIGHT IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE LEVEL OF CONTRAST BETWEEN THE MOTOR EXHAUST AND THE AMBIENT ATMOSPHERE. THIS COULD BE THE REASON FOR A NIGHT LAUNCH, HOWEVER, I BELIEVE THAT THE TECHNOLOGY HAS ADVANCED TO THE POINT WHERE THE DETECTION SYSTEMS CAN SEE PERFECTLY WELL IN BROAD DAYLIGHT. THUS, THERE SHOULD BE NO NEED TO LOSE VALUABLE VIDEO DATA BY LAUNCHING AT NIGHT.
3) THIS MAY HAVE BEEN A TEST, NOT OF THE D-5 ICBM, BUT OF A SYSTEM BEING DEVELOPED TO INTERCEPT SUBMARINE BASED ICBM’s LAUNCHED NEAR OUR COASTS. OUR VULNERABILITY TO SUCH AN ATTACK WAS DEMONSTRATED BY THE RECENT LAUNCH OF A SUBMARINE BASED ICBM OFF THE COAST OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. THE MOTIVATION FOR A NIGHT LAUNCH MAY THEN HAVE BEEN TO DENY OUR ENEMIES AS MUCH VISUAL DATA AS POSSIBLE.
4) I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR AN EXPLANATION OF THE BLUE LIGHT NOTED BY OBSERVERS, AND VISIBLE IN THE PUBLISHED VIDEO CLIPS. I HAVE NEVER OBSERVED THIS PHENOMENON IN ANY OF THE LAUNCHES THAT I HAVE PERSONALLY OBSERVED.
YOURS IN CHRIST
I’M NOT A ROCKET SCIENTIST BY ANY MEANS… BUT I KNOW A CONFLICTING STORY WHEN I HEAR ONE…
SO THESE LAUNCHES REQUIRE FURTHER REVIEW!!!
Several factors are in play here that I have already mentioned in previous posts this week, some I found alarming to begin with, but now after coming across a map on Dave Hodges Page of where naval assets are positioned, I think there is even more cause for uncertainty. In the legal world, it is sometimes said, each person is entitled to their own defense, but what they are not entitled to, is their own facts. The facts are that Breitbart reported back on February 23, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced massive cuts to the size of the armed services, slashing the army to its pre-World War II size. In 2011, the army had some 566,000 soldiers; Hagel wants it cut to somewhere between 440,000 and 450,000 troops by 2019. If Congress does not add additional funding, Hagel threatens to slash that number to 420,000 by 2019. As recent as July, Furthermore, on July 9, the Washington Times reported The Army’s plans to cut 40,000 troops from its ranks in the next two years.
Throughout his time in office, Obama has cut over 300 high ranking offices including admirals and generals, many of which can be found listed by name here.
Throughout his tenure in office, dismantling the military has always been a priority of Obama’s, but what is so troubling, is the rate he's managed to transfer those funds to domestic federal agencies to buy military grade gear. It's not even like Obama has helped out the federal agencies just a little either. Obama has given federal agencies under his direct control adrenaline shots full of military gear and AT LEAST 6 BILLION matching hollow point bullets to go with the gear. Many have put the estimates closer to 12 BILLION HOLLOW POINTS, which would givefederal agencies the firing power to shoot every man, woman, and child on this entire planet roughly 1.5x. What do you suppose that is for? Don’t tell me target practice either. Have you ever seen what a Hollow Point does to it’s target? They are intended to shred a human being, not be used for target practice. Take a look:
HAVE YOU EVER SEEN A HOLLOW POINT IN ACTION?
THEY ARE NOT INTENDED FOR MINOR FLESH WOUNDS OR TARGET PRACTICE!
THAT'S NOT ALL OBAMA HAS DONE. CARE TO EXPLAIN WHAT ALL THIS IS FOR?
- OBAMA DECIMATING MILITARY WHILE ARMING FEDERAL AGENCIES
- DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE LOADS UP ON BODY ARMOR???
- U.S. POST OFFICE WAS ANNOUNCING A GIANT AMMO PURCHASE
- THE I.R.S. GETS THEIR OWN S.W.A.T. TEAM?
- EPA GETS THEIR OWN S.W.A.T. TEAM
- SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION GETS THEIR OWN S.W.A.T. TEAM
- DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STOCKPILING FIREARMS AND AMMO.
- FOOD & DRUG ADMIN. BUYS NIGHT VISION SUB MACHINE GUNS
- D.H.S. MOST RECENT PURCHASE: 6 BILLION HOLLOW POINT BULLETS
SINCE TAKING OFFICE, OBAMA HAS ALWAYS HAD TROUBLE FOLLOWING THE LAW… AND AT THIS POINT HE’S EMBOLDENED OUR ENEMIES TO TAKE A SHOT AT US!
Yesterday, in a post titled, How Close Is Our Proxy War With Russia To Transitioning Into Actual War, I said the following:
Last week, in an article titled, Russia Starting To Train Civilians To Deal With Nuclear Attack, it was reported that on Friday, Dmitry Rogozin, the Deputy Prime Minister of Russia’s defense industry, suggested that his government should start preparing civilians for a nuclear attack much like the Soviets did during the Cold War. Have you thought to ask why? Obama doesn’t want “Boots” on the ground anywhere, much less nuclear missiles flying, so clearly the Russians aren’t worried about attack from the United States. There are no other nation states in the region, or the world for that matter, with the ability or the desire to challenge the Russians right now. If anything, during this time of surprising American weakness, we are seeing alliances made between countries like Russia and Iran, who have a joint operation going on in Syria, with a Chinese Aircraft Carrier Located Off the Coast Providing them Cover.
With an alliance already of our enemies already working with Russia, Putin clearly has no reason to worry about an American attack, so why train the Russians for nuclear war? Why even announce it? What else has happened recently? Make no mistake, the infamous line in the sand drawn by Obama at the beginning of the Syrian conflict sent a warning signal to Putin that Obama could be pushed around. Furthermore, to continue to build on his confidence, Putin made a terribly revealing set of statements at the UN just over a month ago when he said that ISIS is unequivocally a proxy of the U.S., since we continue to arm them, provide them with fleets of trucks, and refuse to engage in any serious damage to their infrastructure. See for yourself, Putin does not hold back:
In what has been a continued show of force, both the U.S. and Russia have continued to move aircraft into the region that serve no other purpose other than to shoot down other aircraft. Here’s the thing about that, we’re the only two nations in the region with aircraft there to begin with. See where I’m going with all this? Russians say it may be time to start training for nuclear war, even when they have no reason to be fearful, especially when when the Russians are aligned with the only other nation known to have “Carrier Killer” missiles intended to do what their name implies: Sink Aircraft Carriers… the strength of the American Military. So, now that the Proxy War Between America and Russia is REALLY heating up, and the Pentagon will now be supplying ISIS Terrorists in Syria with Aircraft Downing Weapons (presumably for Russian Planes), it’s easy to see where tempers might be starting to seriously flare behind the scenes. Is it ENTIRELY possible the Russians might begin training their people because they intend to strike first? Absolutely! Now ask yourself if it makes sense for the U.S. to launch a very public, very visible missile of it’s own, perhaps in hopes of de-escalating the situation? Think about it.
RIGHT NOW, THE BIGGEST CONCERN OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE THAT THE WORLD KNOWS OBAMA IS WEAK.
Whether Obama launched a second Trident II nuclear capable missile as a warning to potential enemies at home or abroad is anyone’s guess. It’s hard enough keeping track what restroom this president wants people to use, or maybe it’s either one these days, thus trying to understand what he was thinking when he launched a second missile would be an exercise in futility.
A BIGGER CONCERN TO MOST AMERICANS SHOULD BE LESS OF WHAT OBAMA INTENDED BY IT, AND MORE OF WHAT OUR ADVERSARIES DO WITH IT…
WORST CASE, SOMEONE LIKE PUTIN COULD LAUNCH A BLACK FLAG ATTACK AGAINST RUSSIA, BLAME IT ON OBAMA, AND THEN USE IT AS A MEANS OF CONVINCING IRAN AND CHINA TO JOIN RUSSIA IN WAR.
LOOKING AT HOW OUR MILITARY IS POSITIONED, IT CERTAINLY LOOKS LIKE WE ARE AFRAID OF ATTACK, SO PERHAPS THE TEST FIRING OF TWO NUKES WAS TO SHOW WHAT COULD HAPPEN TO ANYONE WHO GETS TO CLOSE? EITHER WAY, IT LOOKS FROM THE MAP AS IF AMERICANS HAVE SOMETHING TO FEAR, BUT DON’T EXPECT OBAMA TO BE HONEST ABOUT IT.